Comparison of URANS and LES Predictions for the Open Phase of the OECD NEA CSNI Fluid Structure Interaction CFD Benchmark

Abstract

The OECD NEA CSNI WGAMA CFD Task Group ran a benchmark in 2020 and 2021 to assess the predictive capabilities of coupled fluid structure interaction (FSI) CFD analysis methods. This paper presents the predictions made for the open phase of the benchmark using URANS and LES turbulence modelling approaches, and a comparison of the results to the experimental data.

The benchmark comprised a channel containing two inline cylinders in cross-flow. The cylinders were fixed at one end, free at the other, and had measured resonant frequencies and damping properties. The URANS modelling used ANSYS Fluent 2-way coupled to ANSYS Mechanical. The LES modelling used Nek5000, 1-way coupled to Diablo. Comparisons with cross-channel velocity profiles are presented, both for the mean flow and its RMS. Comparisons are also made to the frequency spectra for point measurements of fluid velocity and pressure, and for the accelerations of the free end of each cylinder.

URANS predicts the average velocity profiles relatively well, and is able to predict the velocity and acceleration spectra at the shedding frequency. However, the frequency content at the 4th harmonic of the shedding frequency is low in the URANS flow fields, and so does not excite accelerations at the resonant frequency of the cylinders. LES makes better predictions of the average profiles, and the velocity spectra agree well at both the shedding frequency and at higher frequencies. The 1-way coupled LES results show good agreement for acceleration spectra.